First of all I think you write really well. It all flows beautifully, there are no hiccups or painful transitions. I read the entire thing through, even ignoring the phone :) The story was really interesting, and the beginning was written in a way that made me want to hug the poor child.
However I do have to admit that the second half isn’t as good as the first half. It feels like you knew where the story was going before the middle, but after if feels a little half hazard. The fact that even then, the story is still interesting is a testament to your writing skills, but I think that if you could organise the second half as well as the first half, you’d go from having a great story to an amazing story.
The only paragraph in the first half that was a little off – a little less “flow-y” than the rest of the story is this one: “The timer rang and Mom went back to her cookies and I retreated to my homework. I complete the editing of my book report on East of Eden having related to the story like none of the other students in my class. My brother was the Wunderkind while I was always the disappointment no matter what I did or how hard I tried to please. With that out of the way, History was next. I knew why it was important for us to learn about events of the past, 'if you don't remember you are doomed to repeat them,' but the importance of knowing all the dates on which those events happened eluded me. I loved seeing how events directly triggered other equally momentous developments. I knew the order in which they happened, but the exact dates? When would I ever need to know them? I had no desire to be a contestant on Jeopardy.”. To be honest, I found that it didn’t do the rest of the story justice. Maybe a small rewrite?
The other thing that stood out was the swear word in the following paragraph: “Eight days and nights until she finally opened her eyes. I was relieved, though that was short lived. Her first words to me when she was able to focus her eyes were, "Why the f*** did you save me?"”. If I am not mistaken, you were trying to emphasize the mother’s anguish by putting in a word so foreign to what the reader had, up to now, associated with her. While this is a good tactic, I do have to admit that I am of the opinion that using such a tactic isn’t classy, and in the case of your story, I find that it’s another small detail that doesn’t do the rest of your story justice. Maybe describing how the daughter’s teary-eyed relief – how surprised was she to discover that maybe, just maybe, she did love her mother – was dashed away with the mother’s greeting: “Why did you save me? You couldn’t even let me die right.” The mother sighs. “Not even this you could do right.”
There was only one thing I would change in the actual plot. The woman is the biological daughter, so the father needs to or be more involved, or have an excellent reason that is clearly described and maintained throughout the story for not being more present in his daughter’s life, especially after she leaves the house.
I would give a hint earlier on that the main character is a girl; it throws the reader off a little when you realize it a couple of paragraphs in.
A small mistake: "The only time that flicker shoed through was when she was berating and tormenting me" = typo with the word "showed"
All in all, a great story that I do not regret reading, and that I find has potential to become a best-seller! |
|