If I offend you with my comments, my apologies that is not my intent.
Poetry is a lot more complicated than most people think. It is an art form of its own.
I evaluate poems with reasons comparing them to excepted techniques and structures. However, there are always new wave techniques every once in a while.
Free verse does not need to have meter and can but does not need to rhyme however it should follow the rules of English or the language of origin.
There is one exception to this; you are blending it with another poetry technique. (A Free Verse Carmen Figuratum as an example.)
The only reason I mention meter so concisely is in case your poem is a technique I am not familiar with.
There are two types of meter, on or syllabic meter and stressed meter.
To spot on or syllabic meter count syllables, if there is a meter, there is the same number or pattern of syllables in the lines of poetry. (A Haiku has a pattern of 5,7,5 on or syllables.)
Stressed meter is measured in feet. Feet are classified first by the number of syllables in the foot and secondarily by the pattern of vowel lengths or syllable stresses they are comprised of. “Unstressed = short and Stressed = long”
If there is a stressed meter, there is the same number or pattern of syllables in the lines of poetry.
If the poem is a technique I am not familiar with please let me know the name and the rules of the technique.
Word confusion is, Which witch is which? Some people call that a spelling mistake however the words are spelled correctly, just the wrong word.
It is constructed of five Quatrain stanzas.
Of Clerihew: "aabb" rhyme schemes in each stanza throughout the poem.
No spelling errors or typos that I could find.
No word confusion that I could spot.
Not sure if you tried for a stressed meter, a person writes a poem in stressed meter by the way they speak for recitation and it can be different from the way I speak according to their accent.
This poem is (8,6,9,9) (6,8,8,8) (7,9,8,7) (8,7,7,8) and (9,9,8,6) on or syllables in the lines.
No fixed meter however the poem still flows quite nicely.
The poem stays on subject.
You did not say what type of poem it was in the description.
I do not perceive a form or shape in the poem like a Carmen Figuratum or a Concrete poem.
I would say it is a Prose Clerihew Penta Quatrain poem, Modern poetry not a traditional style like a Sonnet.
All in all a good poem and an enjoyable read.
Joe
My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Go Noticed" .
|
|