Paranologist,
I find the field of ufology fascinating. I have long accepted UFOs/UAPs as real events, to the point where, while they are rare enough in my life to be major events, reports of others sighting them is simply another routine news story to me. Your article about the several categories of Close Encounters with aliens and alien technology was tremendously interesting and very informative.
That having been said, there are some issues with your article I'd like to point out that might make it a stronger read.
Introduction:
The introduction to your article is clear and concise, but it's ,missing something: a thesis. One of the best bits of writing mentoring I ever got was: in any essay, article, story, pamphlet, or what have you— 1) Tell em what you're gonna tell em; 2) Tell em; 3) Tell em what you told em. In this case, a summary sentence at the end of your first paragraph would tell your readers what you're about to present and why. Why should the reader be interested in what you are writing? In other words, it would tell em what you're gonna tell em.
Paragraph openers:
In this case, it might be helpful to place your paragraph openers in bold type, thus:
Close Encounters of the First Kind: are when unexplainable flying aircraft...
Alternatively, you might choose to make your "headers" part of the opening sentence of the paragraph, which would be more correct in any case. Here's an example:
Close Encounters of the Second Kind are when there is a physical effect on electrical systems caused by...
Structure:
You have a lot of fragments in this article that should be drawn out into sentences. Here's a couple of instances:
Paragraph 4: The UFO Crash in Roswell, New Mexico in 1947.
Paragraph 3: When there are power outages like in New York, and missile silos go off line, or cars will not start after a UFO is sighted.
These need a subject, verb, and object. Currently, there is a subject without a verb or object, and a dependent clause with no parent, respectively. Ensure your sentences are structured completely and correctly to convey your message with greater clarity and precision.
There is an issue with paragraph structure, as well. The third and fifth paragraphs are just 2 examples of this issue. You have a line break in the middle of your paragraph where there should not be one. For instance, in the third paragraph, there should not be a line break between "...Sighted" and "And crop circles..."
Refrerences:
This one's neither right nor wrong, but I would consider putting your references, such as Whitley Streiber's Communion (an awesome book, by the way) as footnotes to the article. It's not wrong, per se, to cite them as references inline in your paragraphs, as you've done. However, putting all your citations in one place, as footnotes, allows the reader to see them all at once and investigate further without having to read back though the entire article to find one reference that struck them as interesting.
Conclusion:
This is where you "tell em what you told em." Your copnclusion would be much stronger with a summary of what was just presented, why the reader should care about it and retain it, and how, if, or why it will have an impact on the reader or world at large moving into the future.
This article has valuable and fascinating information in it; your research on the subject shows. I was glad to have an opportunity to read it. I am hoping there will be more on this topic as I peek further into your portfolio.
This review offered by
Jeffrey
——————————
 "The Power Reviewers Group"   
![Power Review Image - Triple Guitar [#2194837]
~Click here to join a fun reviewing group~](/main/trans.gif) Image #2333342 over display limit. -?-
Please note that my reviews are intended to be
respectful and encouraging.
If you feel I have been rude, cruel,
or otherwise inappropriate,
please report this review to a moderator.
|