I'm with hopelesslyoptm on this one (I also believe I'm one of the people who has random reviewed some of his older items ) I hate getting to the end of a random review piece only to see that it was written in 2002 and stored in a dark closet since then. I feel to be most constructive with a random review, it should be on an item the author has worked on recently, or at least has some *memory* of having written. I think if you could make random reviews more weighted to be inclined to pull up recent or highlighted items it would be awesome.
MESSAGE THREAD
Random Reads · 02-21-13 7:25am by A Non-Existent User
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.11 seconds at 2:05pm on Nov 01, 2025 via server WEBX1.
) I hate getting to the end of a random review piece only to see that it was written in 2002 and stored in a dark closet since then. I feel to be most constructive with a random review, it should be on an item the author has worked on recently, or at least has some *memory* of having written. I think if you could make random reviews more weighted to be inclined to pull up recent or highlighted items it would be awesome. 
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
