Reviewers Anonymous

You think my reply was nasty Nick? You seem to have a first hand knowledge. It wasn't nasty, if anything it was polite, if rather dry and sarcastic. Yes, I would have preferred a signed review.

Furthermore, he would have only have been able to reply via the e-mail system which would compromise his identity which in turn would undermine the purpose of the anonymous option.

Ah, don't I bet that he would have liked to reply, even if it was just to protect his reputation as an author, or a reviewer. Having made use of his right to anonymity, he abandoned any recourse in his right to reply, can't have it and eat it as well you know.

Also, I have no problems with sharing the rest of it with you, here it is:

I feel this is a peace of fluff with nothing in way of depth. This might have been a better if it had been character driven. I think if this was done in the way of dairy or a letter this would been a more interesting read. At least then, you could justify the lack of description, character development and action.

Oh, I just noticed dairy, damned, I missed that one!

In fact, now I re-read it, I think my item put him into such a state that his fingers were going faster than his brain. This guy could re-write some great classics, 'The Dairy of Ann Frank' for example.

Jessibelle, I also received an upgrade from a kind anon and I'm extremely grateful

All the best,
Deborah (Piva)