Sometimes Genius, Sometimes Fool

Cash Grab Or Restructure America? pfft!

IN THIS EPISODE of Ask The Right Questions?

Michael Gorbachev - “…I have often told listeners that I feel Americans need their own change — a perestroika, not like the one in my country, but an American perestroika — and the reaction has been markedly different.”

So, is America going through some kind of Perestroika?

Google-AI
While a direct replication of Soviet perestroika (restructuring) is unlikely due to differing political systems, some analysts argue the U.S. is experiencing a similar moment of necessary, painful, and urgent systemic reform. Parallels are drawn regarding potential systemic decline, shifts in economic thinking, and efforts to overhaul bureaucratic structures.
Arguments for a "U.S. Perestroika" Moment:
* Economic Strategy Shift: A profound shift in U.S. strategic and economic thinking, recognized in 2023 as needing to fix a flawed, long-standing approach, is seen as a potential "perestroika" moment.
* Systemic Overhaul: Current efforts to reduce government entanglement, challenge established institutions, and reorder political priorities are compared to restructuring attempts.
* Information Control: Similar to the late Soviet period, current American politics features intense debates over language, such as redefining diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), and using executive orders to alter official narratives.
* Global Retreat: Some suggest the U.S. is undergoing a "surrender of power" comparable to voluntary Soviet withdrawals, marking a drastic change in global posture.
Key Differences and Challenges:
* Systemic Structure: The U.S. is a democracy with a Constitution and different economic foundations, unlike the centrally planned Soviet model.
* Outcome Uncertainty: While perestroika aimed for reform, it ultimately led to the collapse of the Soviet Union.
* Lack of Consensus: Unlike the top-down nature of Soviet reforms, similar changes in the U.S. face intense political, social, and legal resistance.
Analysts like Harold James have noted that while comparisons are made, the U.S. system's unique, long-term fundamentals make a total replication of the Soviet collapse unlikely, though systemic, painful restructuring is ongoing.

SUGGESTED Articles:
2023-American About To Have It’s Perestroika Moment

https://nationalinterest.org/feature/america-about-have-its-perestroika-moment-2...

3/2025 - Trump Brings Perestroika To America
https://asiatimes.com/2025/03/trump-brings-perestroika-to-america/

2012-M.Gorbachev-Perestroika Will Renew The West (me: change coming?)
https://www.ajc.com/news/opinion/global-perestroika-will-renew-and-the-west/CxT8...

Google AI-
Mikhail Gorbachev proposed a "global perestroika" in his later years, arguing that the need for "new thinking" to solve global challenges—such as environmental issues, poverty, and nuclear proliferation—could renew the U.S. and the West, just as his reforms aimed to restructure the Soviet Union. This concept emphasized universal cooperation, interdependence, and a moral foundation for international politics rather than zero-sum, conflict-driven approaches.
Key aspects of Gorbachev's "global perestroika" vision included:
* A Call for New Thinking: Similar to how perestroika (restructuring) and glasnost(openness) were needed to break the totalitarian system in the Soviet Union, Gorbachev argued the West needed a similar, profound change in its approach to international relations.
* Solving Global Challenges: The goal was to move beyond the Cold War mentality to address modern challenges like inequality and climate change, which he believed required collective, cooperative, and non-violent action.
* Overcoming Structural Issues: Gorbachev argued that the West, particularly the US, needed its own "perestroika" to move beyond economic and political systems that were failing to meet the needs of humanity.
* Moral Foundation: Politics should not be a "dirty business" but must be anchored in a moral core that focuses on the common good, overcoming the cynicism of pure power politics.
Gorbachev believed that this, the "new thinking," would renew the West by forcing it to confront its own limitations and adapt to a more interconnected, interdependent world, ultimately creating a more stable and prosperous global order.

—————————-
More, and my biggest concern with rampant inflation, economic colllapse…there seems among us those who are aware of something and grabbing up cash like it’s on fire…
Rumors of conglomerations buying out little guy/mom and pop may mean poorer service, fixed rates, less guarantees…just think…Yeltsin’s Russia…

https://theconversation.com/will-the-u-s-collapse-like-the-soviet-union-did-2502...


Man in blue Mystery prediction of Nostradamus
(play that “card” in response to pondering how close are we to Nostradamus’ 27-year World War? Nukes? Assured mutual destruction??

Kåre เลียม Enga

Google AI-
Yes, interpretations of Nostradamus's 16th-century quatrains have long featured a prediction regarding a "leader in blue" or a "blue turban" who is deemed a significant threat to world peace. This figure is often linked to interpretations of a third "Antichrist" or "King of Terror".
Key Aspects of the "Leader in Blue" Prophecy:
* The Blue Turban/Leader: Nostradamus enthusiasts frequently cite a prophecy describing a "strong master" from "Greater Arabia" who wears a blue turban and enters Europe. This figure is portrayed as a source of terror and war, leading to a long-lasting conflict.
* The "King of Terror" (Mabus): Many interpretations of the "leader in blue" are intertwined with the prediction of "Mabus" or a "King of Terror" who emerges to disrupt the global order.
* World War III/Conflict: Predictions often suggest this leader will spark a conflict (sometimes described as World War III) that lasts for 27 years, often involving alliances against the West.
* Interpretation and Misinterpretation: These predictions are highly interpretive and often adjusted to fit modern events. Some interpretations from the 1980s linked this to a 1988 Middle Eastern leader, while more recent interpretations have sometimes tried to adapt the "blue" theme to other political figures.
Important Context:
* Vague Nature: Nostradamus’s Les Propheties are written in vague, poetic, and often symbolic quatrains, making them subject to constant re-interpretation.
* Unfulfilled Dates: Previous interpretations of this specific "King of Terror" or "blue" figure often pointed to 1999 or 1988, neither of which resulted in the predicted apocalypse.
* Modern Reinterpretation: The "leader in blue" theme is frequently updated, with some recent internet speculation attempting to connect these old predictions to modern political leaders.
Disclaimer: Interpretations of Nostradamus are subjective, and many predictions attributed to him have not come to pass as interpreted.

https://www.tyla.com/news/politics/living-nostradamus-donald-trump-nicolas-madur...

Nostrawhatnow?